Click on photo to enlarge
AP Photo/Stephan Savoia
Bristol Palin, 17, holds her brother Trig during the campaign rally where Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., introduced Bristol and Trig's mom, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
Even Republicans were startled by the announcement that the 17-year-old unmarried daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant.
A statement released by the campaign Monday said Palinâs daughter Bristol âcame to us with news that we as parents knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever plannedâ and that their daughter âhas our unconditional love and support.â
Such news so soon after a VP selection in campaigns and times past may have meant not only a scandal on Monicagate proportions, but possibly an automatic loss for the ticket in November.
This campaign and this time seem different, however.
The McCain camp admits it knew of the pregnancy even before selecting Palin on Friday, and itâs difficult to imagine such a massive âother footâ dropping on the McCain campaign without it knowing.
But some political experts find it possible the GOP nominee made the decision of announcing the Palin choice knowing that the pregnancy in the family may actually help the campaign.
The calculation is a risky, but potentially beneficial one.
It would be very unlikely that Barack Obama and company would attack the news. Obama himself included teenage pregnancy on a list of things the Democrat nominee sees as needing improvement in America during his nomination acceptance speech just days before.
Thatâs not to say a portion of the partisan fringe wouldnât take advantage of the story, and liberal blogs were abuzz of attacks and negative throws toward Palinâs family even before confirmation of the news broke Monday.
To the advantage of the McCain campaign, Obama was then all but forced to come to his rivalâs defense.
âWe donât go after peopleâs families. We donât get them involved in the politics. Itâs not appropriate and itâs not relevant. Our people were not involved in any way in this and they will not be. And if I ever thought there was somebody in my campaign that was involved in something like that, theyâd be fired,â Obama said on Monday.
Behind closed doors, we can imagine Obama advisers singing a different tune. Itâs a Catch 22 for the Democrat nominee, at least at the moment.
Obama has been accused of having difficulty connecting with the average American. By contrast, the Palin choice is a bid not only to shatter the glass ceiling, but serves as a strong conservative rebuttal to Democratsâ claims that McCain and other Republicans are out of touch.
That Palinâs âproblemsâ may actually help the campaign has not been lost on the political punditry.
As hard as Democrats try to portray a ticket of Obama and Joe Biden as blue collar to the bone, the credentials of each pales in comparison to a small town working mom raising a family of five children.
Whatâs more, McCainâs conservative base is sure to appreciate the decision on the family to keep the child.
Even attacking Palin's credentials while avoiding the latest news of the pregnancy of Palin's other family mis-steps may prove politically dangerous for Obama.
Any âready to leadâ criticism surely to be raised by Palinâs rivals will inevitably lead to a discussion of what Barack Obama himself lacks in commander in chief credentials.
Meanwhile, Republicans stand to win the authenticity argument. What family doesnât have a skeleton or two in its closet?
In any case, the question at hand will remain unanswered until November: has Obama's new tone of average American politics handed his rival a slam dunk?
September 2, 2008
11:29 a.m.Report inappropriate content
People are not attacking Palin's daughter, they are rightly pointing out the hypocrisy of a Republican establishment that has advanced the politics of character assassination and undermined the Freedom of Religion in pursuit of power. The internet should be replete with apologies from Republicans for supporting right-wing media and party wackos who bludgeon and litmus test fellow Americans with some Biblical passages when politically expedient, while not doing so with other passages like those on fidelity, fornication, shell fish, swine, and indentured servitude. Christian Fundamentalists in the Republican Party and Media that want to impose their particular religious interpretations on others can't have it both ways:
Either, a pregnancy is a personal matter SEPARATE from government (as most open minded freedom loving Americans argue), or it isn't.
Christian Fundamentalists want to impose non-medical/religious-only beliefs on people outside of their church in a nation where your pledge of allegiance means you swear not to do that. By advocating the enforcement of her spirituality into law, Palin invited us to do something we shouldn't have to: to examine the consequences of the imposition of Palin's religious beliefs on those of us who don't share them. Hypocrites deserve worse than being put in front of a mirror that reflects the "family values"/"I'm more Christian than you" that were used to distract the nation from a rational and substantiated discussion on issues that are most deserving of our attention.
Christ was the first to advocate a separation of church and state when he declared "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's" (Matthew 22:21, see also John 18:36). Don't you dare use him to hide your lack of integrity, self-reflection, and moral courage. Not even someone who Christian Fundamentalists believe is fit to run the country and pick Supreme Court justices; who embodies their "Christian Values"; is able to keep her adolescent daughter abstinent. If you don't want people to look at how well the politics that puts "abstinence-only education" ahead of adolescent welfare worked out for your daughter, do us all a favor, mind your own business and remember your oath to uphold the Constitution means real American patriots would sooner die than allow their or anyone else's religious-only beliefs to be forced onto others.
September 2, 2008
11:42 a.m.Report inappropriate content
Excellent points. It will be interesting to see if those concerns are among those raised by Democrats this week.